Agiloft Pricing Overview: Features, Cost, and Alternatives

Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is a strategic tool for legal operations and general counsel, enabling organizations to automate, manage, and optimize contracts across the enterprise. Agiloft is a recognized CLM platform offering a low-code, highly configurable solution that adapts to diverse business needs.

Legal teams exploring Agiloft often search for insights on pricing transparency, module costs, AI capabilities, workflow automation, and deployment options. Typically, readers fall into three categories:

1. Early Research: Comparing CLM platforms, understanding core features, and evaluating AI potential.
   
   

2. Vendor Shortlist: Assessing how modules, pricing, and deployment fit enterprise requirements.
   
   

3. Purchase Decision: Determining ROI, integration needs, and total cost of ownership relative to competitors.

Related Article: What is Contract Lifecycle Management? A Quick Overview

CLM pricing varies significantly due to several structural factors:

• User Licenses: More users directly increase subscription costs.
  
  

• Feature Modules: AI-powered review, workflow automation, reporting dashboards, and compliance tracking are often optional and priced separately.
  
  

• Contract Volume: Higher volumes require scalable infrastructure and influence tier selection.
  
  

• Deployment Model: Cloud, on-premises, or hybrid options affect licensing, maintenance, and implementation.
  
  

• Implementation & Support: Low-code configuration, training, and consulting costs differ by organizational complexity.

Understanding these drivers is critical for legal operations leaders seeking to balance cost, functionality, and adoption speed.

Agiloft Pricing Overview & Breakdown

Agiloft does not provide a fixed public price list. Pricing is modular, tailored to the organization’s size, workflow complexity, and contract load.

Key Pricing Components:

• Core Platform Licensing: Based on the number of users and contract capacity.
  
  

• Optional Modules: AI review, automated approvals, compliance tracking, and analytics can be added incrementally.
  
  

• Implementation Services: Workflow configuration, data migration, and training are scoped individually.
  
  

• Integrations: Connections to ERP, CRM, or document management systems may add costs depending on complexity.
  
  

• Support & Maintenance: Enterprise support tiers, software updates, and optimization services are part of the total investment.

Agiloft is ideal for organizations seeking deep customization, allowing mid-market teams to scale gradually while large enterprises benefit from comprehensive, configurable modules.

Agiloft Reviews: User Experience

Where Users See Strength:

• Flexibility & Low-Code Customization: Users appreciate the ability to configure workflows without deep IT involvement.

Areas for Improvement:

• Implementation Complexity: Initial setup and workflow configuration require significant time and resources.
  
  

• Learning Curve: Low-code flexibility can feel overwhelming for teams new to CLM.
  
  

• Cost of Advanced Features: AI modules or multiple optional features can raise total investment.
  
  

• Support Response: A few users note that complex customizations may require more proactive vendor support.

Agiloft provides robust functionality, but its flexibility can introduce operational complexity during initial deployment.

Agiloft Pricing vs Competitors: Cost Structure and Financial Implications

When evaluating CLM vendors, the real differentiator is not features it is pricing architecture and total cost predictability. Legal operations leaders must understand how each platform structures its commercial model and how that impacts long-term spend.

1. Pricing Transparency

• Agiloft – Quote-based pricing. No public pricing tiers. Final cost depends on users, modules, integrations, and implementation scope.
  
  

• Icertis – Fully enterprise, custom pricing. Designed for large global organizations with complex requirements.
  
  

• Ironclad – Tiered enterprise pricing, but still requires sales engagement for full cost clarity.
  
  

• Volody – Structured, transparent pricing model with embedded AI capabilities included upfront.

Implication:
Quote-based pricing increases negotiation complexity and reduces budget predictability. Transparent pricing models reduce procurement friction and internal approval cycles.

2. Licensing Structure

• Agiloft – Primarily user-based licensing with additional module costs.
  
  

• Icertis – Enterprise licensing often structured around organizational scale and contract complexity.
  
  

• Ironclad – User-tier and workflow-based pricing.
  
  

• Volody – Scalable user-based model with bundled AI functionality.

Implication:
If AI, analytics, or workflow automation are priced as add-ons, total spend increases significantly as usage scales.

3. Implementation Cost Intensity

• Agiloft – Low-code flexibility requires configuration effort. Implementation can extend depending on workflow complexity.
  
  

• Icertis – High implementation intensity due to enterprise customization.
  
  

• Ironclad – Moderate implementation; optimized for faster deployment.
  
  

• Volody – Accelerated deployment with pre-configured workflows.

Financial Impact:
Implementation is often the largest hidden cost in CLM adoption. Longer configuration cycles increase consulting spend and delay ROI realization.

4. AI Cost Structure

• Agiloft – AI capabilities may be modular or optional.
  
  

• Icertis – AI and contract intelligence often priced within advanced modules.
  
  

• Volody – AI review, metadata extraction, and obligation tracking embedded within the platform.

Implication:
If AI is modular, organizations must budget separately for automation. Embedded AI reduces incremental expansion costs.

5. Scalability Economics

For a mid-market legal team (15–25 users):

• Modular pricing can initially appear affordable.
  
  

• Expansion often increases cost due to add-ons and integrations.

For a large enterprise (200+ users, multi-region):

• Enterprise vendors like Icertis or Agiloft may align with governance complexity.
  
  

• Total cost can increase significantly due to customization and consulting layers.

Volody’s bundled model reduces cost volatility during scale.

6. Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

TCO in CLM includes:

• Licensing

• AI modules

• Implementation services

• Integration consulting

• Training

• Ongoing support

Platforms with modular AI and configuration-heavy deployment typically show higher TCO over 3–5 years. Platforms with embedded automation and faster onboarding typically demonstrate earlier ROI realization.

Cost Architecture Summary

Strategic Interpretation

• Agiloft provides flexibility but requires careful cost forecasting.

• Icertis fits complex global enterprises but demands significant investment.

• Ironclad serves specific workflow or analytics niches.

• Volody reduces pricing ambiguity by bundling AI and accelerating deployment, improving financial predictability.

Related Article: Summize Pricing in 2025: Value vs. Cost for Legal Teams

Why Choose Volody Over Agiloft

Volody offers embedded AI, cost transparency, and accelerated deployment, making it a strong alternative for legal operations leaders.

Advantages:

• Embedded Advanced AI: Automatic metadata extraction, risk assessment, and obligation tracking.
  
  

• Accelerated Deployment: Faster go-live than low-code platforms requiring workflow configuration.
  
  

• Transparent Pricing: Simplifies budgeting without hidden module costs.
  
  

• Dedicated Support: Proactive customer success ensures adoption and optimization.
  
  

• Unified Platform: Combines workflow automation, AI review, analytics, and legal collaboration in one system.

Feature Table Comparison:

Volody reduces operational complexity while maintaining enterprise-level CLM capability.

How to Choose the Right CLM

Legal teams should evaluate:

1. Budget & Licensing: Include modules, users, integrations, and professional services.
   
   

2. AI & Automation Needs: Reduce manual review, increase workflow efficiency.
   
   

3. Integration Requirements: Ensure ERP, CRM, and document management connectivity.
   
   

4. Implementation Timelines: Factor in internal adoption resources.
   
   

5. Support & Training: Align vendor support with team skill levels and compliance needs.

Customers report Volody accelerates contract approval cycles, improves compliance visibility, and reduces administrative effort compared with Agiloft.

Related Articles: AI Contract Review vs. Human Lawyers: Speed, Accuracy & ROI

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. How does Agiloft pricing differ from Volody?

Agiloft is modular and quote-based; Volody offers embedded AI and transparent, scalable pricing.

2. Does Volody include AI contract review by default?

Yes, no additional module purchase is required.

3. Can Agiloft integrate with ERP and CRM systems?

Yes, but complex integrations may require consulting or professional services.

4. How quickly can teams deploy Volody vs Agiloft?

Volody has pre-configured workflows for faster adoption; Agiloft requires low-code configuration.

5. Is Volody suitable for mid-market and enterprise teams?

Yes, it scales efficiently across both.

6. Does Volody reduce long-term CLM costs?

Embedded AI and workflow automation lower total cost of ownership.

7. What type of support does Volody provide?

Dedicated success teams ensure onboarding, optimization, and ongoing assistance.